Economy
This pessimism on Hungary's growth outlook is really surprising - City analysts
Save article
Share

On the slide below Attard Montalto presented how he sees the past 18 months of the government and what he thinks led to where we are today. At a certain point in time the cabinet has finally realised the damages of its one-off measures (e.g. the sectoral taxes), the deceleration in capital inflow and their impacts on growth. This way it has understood that the implementation of far-reaching reforms will hit obstacles and that prompted it to embark on even more unorthodox measures, such as the lump sum repayment of FX debt at below-market rates.

He said there will be no meaningful capital injection in Hungary in the next two to three years.
“When you have investors looking elsewhere (due to a number of factors such as the sectoral taxes, etc.) it weights down on potential growth. [...] Hungary is too scary, there are too much uncertainty about the tax regime for instance," he said.

Ash stressed that when it comes to reform programme the emphasis is always on how it is implemented. And this is one of the weakest points in the government’s work, he added. The other is that the measures “are killing" growth.
The economist noted that the departure of deputy state secretary András Kármán - who also holds a presentation at today’s conference - from the Economy Ministry was a “hit" for the international investment community that clearly has a negative view on the final repayment scheme.
He urged “both sides", i.e. the banks and regulating authorities, in the foreign currency lending problem to consider their responsibility in creating this problem, and that the burdens should also be born by two parties, the lenders and the state and not just the banks.

Tenconi said, however, that “there have been too many unorthodox measures" recently, adding that the government should go easy on this, because the majority of banks are held by foreign owners.
With regard to asset prices the analyst said she was negative, pointing out that the biggest risk is if capital flight starts on the government securities market. In this case “the vicious circle may become too large" and in the end there may be not enough meaningful players on the buying side.










